crudlet.org

Home > Failed To > Statd Unable To Register Statd

Statd Unable To Register Statd

Contents

Message #41 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Mattia Dongili To: [email protected] Cc: Nicolas Boullis , User Mode Linux Maintainers , Anibal Monsalve Salazar Subject: Re: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Home | New | Search | [?] | Reports | Requests | Help | NewAccount | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] | Report Bugzilla Bug Legal Problems with This is with user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-1, portmap 5-21 and nfs-common 1.0.10-4. Note that inside UML, running "/etc/init.d/nfs-common restart" fixes the problem, with this in the log: rpc.statd[2168]: Version 1.0.10 Starting Cheers, Nicolas Reply sent to "Steinar H. have a peek at this web-site

chown /var/lib/nfs to choose different user Feb 12 00:02:19 martin-xps.lico.nl rpc.statd[23582]: failed to create RPC listeners, exiting Feb 12 00:02:19 martin-xps.lico.nl systemd[1]: rpc-statd.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1 Feb 12 00:02:19 The UML system used to be a sarge system that I upgraded to etch. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional > requirements here) > - A dependancy added to nfslock's RPM to download rpcbind > Either an error message from Do anyone know why this happens? his comment is here

Rpc.statd Failed To Create Rpc Listeners, Exiting

I have a NFS system in my /etc/fstab, which leads to early startup of portmap (don't know if this makes a difference). Do you think I should try to upgrade user-mode-linux? Full text and rfc822 format available. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Does it change anything to set ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no in /etc/default/rcS? Message #15 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Nicolas Boullis To: "Steinar H. Do you think I > should try to upgrade user-mode-linux? Failed To Create Rpc Listeners Exiting Redhat Jan 20 23:04:22 grayf kernel: rpcbind: server localhost not responding, timed out Jan 20 23:04:22 grayf kernel: RPC: failed to contact local rpcbind server (errno 5).

I have a NFS system in my /etc/fstab, which leads to early startup > of portmap (don't know if this makes a difference). Unit Rpc-statd.service Entered Failed State Gunderson" To: Nicolas Boullis Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: rpc.statd[2058]: unable to register (statd, 1, udp). blog | github Offline #15 2016-02-16 20:14:36 spychodelics Member Registered: 2009-06-08 Posts: 22 Re: [SOLVED] AutoFS NFS doesn't mount on startup, failed to create rpc Yes, i tried the solutions but http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/285452/rpcbind-nfs-fails-failed-to-create-rpc-listeners-exiting I have no idea why you believe the initscripts package is responsible for this problem. "changed multiple times" do not seem like a good explanation to me.

Full text and rfc822 format available. How To Start Rpc.statd In Linux Account: BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY (acct # 5221553) TAM customer: no SRM customer: no Strategic: no 3. Also, its behaviour with regard to NFS at boot-time was >>recently changed multiple times... > > > I have no idea why you believe the initscripts package is responsible > for I find nothing in the bug report indicating why > this should be a bug in initscripts.

Unit Rpc-statd.service Entered Failed State

Package: initscripts; Maintainer for initscripts is Debian sysvinit maintainers ; Source for initscripts is src:sysvinit. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=193410 Not the answer you're looking for? Rpc.statd Failed To Create Rpc Listeners, Exiting Last modified: Thu Dec 22 11:35:14 2016; Machine Name: buxtehude Debian Bug tracking system Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Failed To Start Nfs Status Monitor For Nfsv2/3 Locking What are Iron nuggets and what can they be used for?

Installing, enabling, and starting the rpcbind service solved the problem. My fs has been built as etch and upgraded to sid, will try a > sarge-to-etch-upgraded-fs later. > > what's the order of scripts in your /etc/rc2.d? Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results. Copy sent to Debian sysvinit maintainers . Failed To Create Rpc Listeners Exiting Centos 7

Cheers, Nicolas Information forwarded to [email protected], Anibal Monsalve Salazar , User Mode Linux Maintainers : Bug#399523; Package nfs-common,portmap,user-mode-linux. May 25 11:41:13 tebow rpc.yppasswdd[14594]: unable to register yppaswdd udp service. In What Order Will These Fill? Source No, nothing such. > Does it change anything to set ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no in /etc/default/rcS?

Full text and rfc822 format available. Centos 7 Failed To Start Nfs Status Monitor For Nfsv2/3 Locking I think 6.8 may be the last chance for RFE so maybe close as WONT_FIX if you don't agree? Feb 12 00:02:19 martin-xps.lico.nl rpc.statd[23584]: Version 1.3.2 starting Feb 12 00:02:19 martin-xps.lico.nl rpc.statd[23584]: Flags: TI-RPC Feb 12 00:02:19 martin-xps.lico.nl rpc.statd[23584]: Running as root.

How would people living in eternal day learn that stars exist?

Also, its behaviour with regard to NFS at boot-time was recently changed multiple times... /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ Bug reassigned from package `nfs-common,portmap,user-mode-linux' to `initscripts'. I wonder if this was previously working as a socket rather than service, but something went wrong somewhere. i've got: rpc.statd[22306]: Version 1.1.0 Starting rpc.statd[22306]: unable to register (statd, 1, udp). Job For Rpc-statd.service Failed Because The Control Process Exited With Error Code. Copy sent to Debian sysvinit maintainers .

Feb 12 00:02:19 martin-xps.lico.nl systemd[1]: Unit rpc-statd.service entered failed state. Comment 2 cje 2007-09-28 08:56:21 EDT ah, right. Full text and rfc822 format available. boot 3.

Hence, I think that: - there is still a bug somewhere, which means the bug should not be closed; - the bug is somewhat specific since my attempt to reproduce it In syslog, I can see: kernel: lockd: cannot monitor WW.XX.YY.ZZ kernel: lockd: failed to monitor WW.XX.YY.ZZ (and then my application failing because of the failure to lock) And before that, looking run sealert -l 0669cea2-c098-4d1b-ac24-b07a9cd337f4 I started a new bug for this selinux policy problem: #429624 Comment 6 Michael Ploujnikov 2008-01-21 19:42:43 EST I can reproduce this on a machine that has Maybe some reordering > has happened between sarge and etch? > > Here I have: > 172.20.0.20 ~ $ ls /etc/rc2.d > README S20inetd S20ssh S91apache2 > S10sysklogd S20makedev S21nfs-common S99rc.local

Full text and rfc822 format available. No, I am an happy NFS user on any fs I tried so far (up-to-date sid, etch and sarge). Message #25 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Nicolas Boullis To: "Steinar H. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

Severity set to `normal' from `important' Request was from Nicolas Boullis to [email protected] Anibal or Javier, do you know what this portmap message is about: portmap[2097]: connect from 127.0.0.1 to set(status): request from unprivileged port ? I reboot at most once a day so I didn't notice this right away. I ended up reverting nfs-utils to 1.3.1-1 so I could continue connecting to nfsv3 Offline #5 2015-02-10 00:23:33 Pitou Member Registered: 2011-02-13 Posts: 62 Re: [SOLVED] AutoFS NFS doesn't mount on

Mar 10 09:20:28 system.attlocal.net systemd[1]: nfs-server.service: Unit entered failed state.

Border