crudlet.org

Home > Sudo Unable > Sudo Unable To Execute /bin/tar Success

Sudo Unable To Execute /bin/tar Success

Root typically has rather minimal privileges in such directories. Events Experts Bureau Events Community Corner Awards & Recognition Behind the Scenes Feedback Forum Cisco Certifications Cisco Press Café Cisco On Demand Support & Downloads Community Resources Security Alerts Security Alerts When you select something to buy, you find yourself presented with similar items as kind suggestions. If command is specified but not allowed, sudo will exit with a status value of 1. have a peek at this web-site

The next time sudo is run a password will be required. Still no change. You need to escape the semicolon at the end of the command: find /backup/hourly.4 -exec mv {} /backup/hourly.2/. ; Re: Method #2 (find) and other methods Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, PATH' May be overridden by the security policy.

Only "ls -1" WITH NO ARGUMENTS can be used... Browse other questions tagged tar or ask your own question. The Command Environment section in the sudoers(5) manual documents how the -i option affects the environment in which a command is run when the sudoers policy is in use. -K' The

Did you mean /usr/bin/apt-get? –Brian Gradin Aug 6 '15 at 1:24 Yes, I will fix that. errno gets reset, those calls succeed and when we get to the warn(3), we call it with an errno of zero, which yields the "Success" message. Also, since all files are being moved (assuming only files are in the directory), this example lends itself to moving the entire directory, either with tar/cpio and gzip, or perhaps just And there you have it.

Example 1 is wrong Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 07/13/2007 - 12:10. > [[email protected] directory]$ mv [a-l]* ../directory2 > [[email protected] directory]$ mv [m-z]* ../directory2 Should be: [[email protected] directory]$ mv This may explain the strange behaviour. In US, is it a good idea to hire a tax consultant for doing taxes? Searching around your local intertubes, you probably have eventually arrived at the conclusion that the problem is due to there being a large number of files to be removed, meaning the

However, in the context, I'd not want to guarantee that you wouldn't get: sudo: unable to execute /bin/sh: Success The odd error probably means that an exec*() family function call returned, If you want to scp a very large number of files from another machine and getting the list too long error, you can try the following script. Snowman Bowling What is a real-world metaphor for irrational numbers? The editor specified by the policy is run to edit the temporary files.

Sever-sort an array I want to become a living god! https://major.io/2007/07/05/bintar-argument-list-too-long/ Charles http://radio.weblogs.com/0111823/ Re: Method #2 (find) and other methods Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 03/26/2004 - 02:00. Let's look at the code: $ cd /tmp $ wget http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/sudo-1.8.3p1.tar.gz $ tar zxf sudo-1.8.3p1.tar.gz $ cd sudo-1.7.8p1 $ more src/exec.c [...] /* * Like execve(2) but falls back to running write a small shell script called "reverse-scp":
#!/usr/bin/sh
# "reverse-scp" copies with the destination first, unlike scp
dest=$1
shift
scp $* $dest Then you can

Our limitation of ARG_MAX is, apparently, not on the sum of argc + envp, but on a single environment variable. (This appears to contradict POSIX!) The total size of our env http://crudlet.org/sudo-unable/sudo-unable-to-execute-bin-chown-success.html See the PLUGINS section for more information. The first example also had a useless -name '*' specification in it. So the theory is that if our total env was just a single byte bigger, we couldn't exec(3) anything.

So far, so good. I verified by typing this: find readme* -not -perm -o+r -exec ls -l {} \; and get something like -rw------- 1 root root 536871076 Nov 22 14:06 readme_20101122200429 -rw------- 1 root This will cause find to produce ASCIIZ (NUL terminated) filenames, and cause xargs to parse it's input as such (NUL term.) --- which will resolve most of the parsing problems for http://crudlet.org/sudo-unable/sudo-unable-to-execute-bin-rm-success.html would be a more robust and efficient solution.

Although this method may work as a quick fix, it is far from being the ideal solution. Tried #4 - change MAX_ARG_PAGES and recompile but it makes no difference. Help, my office wants infinite branch merges as policy; what other options do we have?

SHELL' Used to determine shell to run with -s option.

Your ls -1 example becomes: ls -1 | xargs -n 10 -i mv {} target_dir I found that xargs is generally faster than the find command. -- SysKoll Re: Why not Has Darth Vader ever been exposed to the vacuum of space? Description sudo allows a permitted user to execute a command as the superuser or another user, as specified by the security policy. Using single-quotes around it is simplest - unless there are single quotes in the command to be executed.

Method #2: Use the find command. ls -1 blah*blah suffers from the same problem. SUDO_USER' Set to the login name of the user who invoked sudo. have a peek here If not fully qualified it is relative to the /usr/libexec directory.

So you should use the following to be portable: tar -cvzf dvr_rdk_v1.tar.gz dvr_rdk/ share|improve this answer answered Aug 10 '14 at 8:33 Mark Plotnick 12.7k12745 add a comment| up vote -1 You can get around it with this: find . -name '*.txt' -print >/tmp/test.manifest
tar -cvzf textfiles.tar.gz --files-from /tmp/test.manifest
find . -name '*.txt' | xargs rm -v Share this post:TwitterGoogleLinkedInRedditEmailPrintTagged It does, however, still descend into the $directory subdirectory tree looking for files to copy into $directory2. However, please be advised that due to the advanced nature of the solution, only experienced Linux users should attempt this hack.

What are the considerations for waterproofing a building's first few floors? Actually, this command can be improved thus: [[email protected] directory]$ find $directory -type f | xargs -i mv {} $directory2/. The sudoers policy only allows root or a user with the ALL privilege on the current host to use this option. -u user' The -u (user) option causes sudo to run exit 21Creating Ontape Backup of DB...command to execute /bin/su - informix -c "ontape -s -L 0 | /bin/gzip > /common/drf/db_drf_backup/drf_ontape_backup.gz" 2>>/common/drf/backup.logdrf_ontape_backup created is of size [116409667]Ontape Backup completed!Creating Tar ballcommand to

it can list all the files, no matter how many, only because it is the command input length that is the limitation, not the output. Submitted by EB (not verified) on Fri, 10/15/2010 - 10:57. The sudoers policy allows uids that are not in the password database as long as the targetpw option is not set. Anybody have a workaround?

Browse other questions tagged linux bash sudo or ask your own question. Select records that intersect more than 3 polygons Snowman Bowling Do progress reports/logging information belong on stderr or stdout? I have a few files in a large directory that I want to make readable by everyone. tar does not need hyphen for options.

Submitted by SysKoll (not verified) on Thu, 05/09/2002 - 01:00. as vi fanatic, my way to resolve this was the following:
ls /tmp > ls_tmp
vim ls_tmp
:v/i_want_this_in_the_name/d #delete all lines not containing i_want_this..
:%s/^/rm \/tmp\// Writing a script was more functional... Thanks Method #4 : works very well, BUT MAYBE VERY DANGEROUS Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 11/27/2008 - 13:17.

But... However, with this example, using $directory/* may be too long, but using $directory/ is not since it is not expanded by the shell. Unless the command is being run in a new pty, the SIGHUP, SIGINT and SIGQUIT signals are not relayed unless they are sent by a user process, not the kernel. The following parameters may be specified by security policy: • real and effective user ID • real and effective group ID • supplementary group IDs • the environment list • current

Border